Given that a major earthquake is expected anytime in the Golden State, and that an earthquake is capable of rattling a home into rubble within a few short minutes, you'd think buying insurance would be a no-brainer -- especially for me, whose level of risk tolerance extends no further than penny slot machines.
But I've noticed a curious trend. People I talk to within the real estate and construction industries -- the very industries I thought would insist on such coverage -- often tell me they haven't bought it. In fact, fewer than 15% of Californians buy quake coverage. What's going on?
There are, in fact, two rational arguments against buying such coverage in California:
- The deductibles are very high, usually 10% to 15% of the insured value of your home. So if your home is insured for up to $300,000, you could be on the hook for $45,000. In a medium sized earthquake, you might sustain that much damage and have to pay it all yourself.
- The California Earthquake Authority (CEA), which is the only source for such insurance, is not government-backed. In a major earthquake, it might just run out of money. So an earthquake that's big enough to get a homeowner past the deductible will probably have done a lot of damage to surrounding homes , and we'll all be running after the same dollars. (Well, maybe not all, given how few people are insured these days. But plenty of people nonetheless.)
So there we have it. Me, I haven't decided about the insurance yet -- but I will be getting that foundation dealt with.
